Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance

From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: 2021-04-07 09:25:37
Message-ID: 20210407182537.5fdb444f6d4510a60524baab@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I rebased the patch because the cfbot failed.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata

On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:27:50 +0900
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:20:49 +0900
> Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:42:00 -0500
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 2/18/21 9:01 PM, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:38:44 +0800
> > > > Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:33 AM Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Attached is a rebased patch (v22a).
> > > >>>
> > > >> Thanks for the patch. Will you think posting a patch with the latest commit
> > > >> at that
> > > >> time is helpful? If so, when others want to review it, they know which
> > > >> commit to
> > > >> apply the patch without asking for a new rebase usually.
> > > > I rebased the patch because cfbot failed.
> > > > http://cfbot.cputube.org/
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's bitrotted a bit more dues to commits bb437f995d and 25936fd46c
> >
> > Thank you for letting me konw. I'll rebase it soon.
>
> Done. Attached is a rebased patch set.
>
> Regards,
> Yugo Nagata
>
> --
> Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

Attachment Content-Type Size
IVM_patches_v22c.tar.gz application/gzip 83.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-04-07 09:53:19 Re: Wired if-statement in gen_partprune_steps_internal
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-04-07 09:20:56 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings