Re: [PATCH] Hooks at XactCommand level

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Takayuki Tsunakawa <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hooks at XactCommand level
Date: 2021-03-28 13:22:07
Message-ID: 20210328132207.hhx3dku2ubeikuhm@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> So, I have nothing more to say about the patch itself. At that point, I guess
> that we can't keep postponing that topic, and we should either:
>
> - commit this patch, or Álvaro's one based on a new grammar keyword for BEGIN
> (maybe without the GUC if that's the only hard blocker), assuming that there
> aren't any technical issue with those
>
> - reject this patch, and I guess set in stone that vanilla postgres will
> never allow that.
>
> Given the situation I'm not sure if I should mark the patch as Ready for
> Committer or not. I'll leave it as-is for now as Álvaro is already in Cc.

I just switched the patch to Ready for Committer.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-03-28 13:23:13 Re: Idea: Avoid JOINs by using path expressions to follow FKs
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2021-03-28 13:12:39 Re: pl/pgsql feature request: shorthand for argument and local variable references