|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Key management with tests|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:51:16AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 06:04:12PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Does anyone know why the cfbot applied the patch listed second first
> > > here?
> > >
> > > http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_31_2925.log
> > >
> > > Specifically, it applied hex..key.diff.gz before hex.diff.gz. I assumed
> > > it would apply attachments in the order they appear in the email.
> > It sorts the filenames (in this case after decompressing step removes
> > the .gz endings). That works pretty well for the patches that "git
> > format-patch" spits out, but it's a bit hit and miss with cases like
> > yours.
> OK, here they are with numeric prefixes. It was actually tricky to
> figure out how to create a squashed format-patch based on another branch.
Here is an updated version built on top of Michael Paquier's patch
and included as my first attachment. This will give Michael's patch
cfbot testing too since the second attachment calls many of the first
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2021-01-12 17:15:59||Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types|
|Previous Message||Andrey Borodin||2021-01-12 16:43:28||Re: libpq compression|