Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another history question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another history question
Date: 2005-03-22 22:36:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My question is if the architecture of postgreSQL were inherited of
> postgres original project or postgreSQL were developed completely with
> a new concept.  Thanks in advance.

There hasn't been any fundamental rearchitecting since Berkeley days.
For instance, look at Postgres 4.2 --- those sources are available on
the net, and if you compare them to current CVS you'll find plenty
that's recognizably the same code.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-22 23:11:10
Subject: Re: odd problem !
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2005-03-22 22:33:04
Subject: Re: odd problem !

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group