Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:14:17PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 01:45:26PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 09:20:35AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On 2020-12-11 21:27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > By the way-- What did you think of the idea of explictly marking the
> > > > types used for bitmasks using types bits32 and friends, instead of plain
> > > > int, which is harder to spot?
> > >
> > > If we want to make it clearer, why not turn the thing into a struct, as in
> > > the attached patch, and avoid the bit fiddling altogether.
> >
> > I like this.
> > It's a lot like what I wrote as [PATCH v31 1/5] ExecReindex and ReindexParams
> > In my v31 patch, I moved ReindexOptions to a private structure in indexcmds.c,
> > with an "int options" bitmask which is passed to reindex_index() et al. Your
> > patch keeps/puts ReindexOptions index.h, so it also applies to reindex_index,
> > which I think is good.
> >
> > So I've rebased this branch on your patch.
> >
> > Some thoughts:
> >
> > - what about removing the REINDEXOPT_* prefix ?
> > - You created local vars with initialization like "={}". But I thought it's
> > needed to include at least one struct member like "={false}", or else
> > they're not guaranteed to be zerod ?
> > - You passed the structure across function calls. The usual convention is to
> > pass a pointer.
>
> I think maybe Michael missed this message (?)
> I had applied some changes on top of Peter's patch.
>
> I squished those commits now, and also handled ClusterOption and VacuumOption
> in the same style.
>
> Some more thoughts:
> - should the structures be named in plural ? "ReindexOptions" etc. Since they
> define *all* the options, not just a single bit.
> - For vacuum, do we even need a separate structure, or should the members be
> directly within VacuumParams ? It's a bit odd to write
> params.options.verbose. Especially since there's also ternary options which
> are directly within params.
> - Then, for cluster, I think it should be called ClusterParams, and eventually
> include the tablespaceOid, like what we're doing for Reindex.
>
> I am awaiting feedback on these before going further since I've done too much
> rebasing with these ideas going back and forth and back.

With Alexey's agreement, I propose something like this.

I've merged some commits and kept separate the ones which are more likely to be
disputed/amended. But it may be best to read the series as a single commit,
like "git diff origin.."

--
Justin