| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Change default of checkpoint_completion_target |
| Date: | 2020-12-07 17:53:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20201207175329.GM16415@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz) wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:03:08AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org) wrote:
> >> You keep making this statement, and I don't necessarily disagree, but if
> >> that is the case, please explain why don't we have
> >> checkpoint_completion_target set to 0.9 by default? Should we change
> >> that?
> >
> > Yes, I do think we should change that..
>
> Agreed. FWIW, no idea for others, but it is one of those parameters I
> keep telling to update after a default installation.
Concretely, attached is a patch which changes the default and updates
the documentation accordingly.
Passes regression tests and doc build. Will register in the January
commitfest as Needs Review.
Thanks,
Stephen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| cct_def_v1.patch | text/x-diff | 5.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2020-12-07 18:13:25 | pg_rewind race condition just after promotion |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2020-12-07 17:31:21 | Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues |