Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)
Date: 2020-11-23 20:31:24
Message-ID: 20201123203124.GA8215@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Nov-19, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:13:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > That still looks useful for debugging, so DEBUG1 sounds fine to me.
>
> By the way, it strikes me that you could just do nothing as long as
> (log_min_messages > DEBUG1), so you could encapsulate most of the
> logic that plays with the lock tag using that.

Good idea, done.

I also noticed that if we're going to accept a race (which BTW already
exists) we may as well simplify the code about it.

I think the attached is the final form of this.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Don-t-hold-ProcArrayLock-longer-than-needed-in-rare-.patch text/x-diff 4.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-11-23 20:36:55 Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2020-11-23 20:31:20 Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix