| From: | "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | ahsan(dot)hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Wrong statistics for size of XLOG_SWITCH during pg_waldump. |
| Date: | 2020-10-09 05:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | 2020100913412132258847@highgo.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello hackers,
We know that pg_waldump can statistics size for every kind of records. When I use
the feature I find it misses some size for XLOG_SWITCH records. When a user does
a pg_wal_switch(), then postgres will discard the remaining size in the current wal
segment, and the pg_waldump tool misses the discard size.
I think it will be better if pg_waldump can show the matter, so I make a patch
which regards the discard size as a part of XLOG_SWITCH record, it works if we
want to display the detail of wal records or the statistics, and patch attached.
What's your opinion?
Regards,
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
EMAIL: mailto:movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix_waldump_size_for_wal_switch.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2020-10-09 05:44:57 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-10-09 05:31:23 | Re: Parallel copy |