Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Fedorov <petr(dot)fedorov(at)phystech(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date: 2020-09-30 07:15:43
Message-ID: 20200930071543.GL1996@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:53:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As far as I can see, patches 0001 and 0002 have been already applied,
> but not 0003. Could you send a rebase to allow the CF bot to run, at
> least?

This was two weeks ago. Looking at 0003, the thing is not really
complicated, but as this thread has stalled I have marked the entry as
RwF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-09-30 07:57:32 Re: Incorrect version of initdb
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-09-30 06:42:19 BUG #16646: systemctl stop postgresql-12 stuck

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-30 07:17:50 Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments
Previous Message Noah Misch 2020-09-30 07:14:26 Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding