| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
| Date: | 2020-09-17 07:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20200917075101.GZ2873@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 04:27:53PM -0700, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> Here is a patch rebasing on master (meant to be applied on top of my
> other multirange patch) and newly including UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION
> OF. FOR PORTION OF works on any table with a temporal primary key. It
> restricts the UPDATE/DELETE to the given time frame, and then if the
> affected row(s) had any "leftovers" above or below the targeted range,
> it INSERTs new rows to preserve the untouched intervals.
This patch had no reviews, unfortunately it cannot be applied
cleanly. Could you send a rebase please?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | yuzuko | 2020-09-17 08:12:36 | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-17 07:45:56 | Re: BUG #15858: could not stat file - over 4GB |