Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Date: 2020-09-17 05:26:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews. I'm hoping to get to this next week (hopefully
> sooner). It was on my TODO list to use this approach (from the last
> round of reviews), so I'll make sure to do it first.

Nothing has happened here in two months, so I am marking this stuff as
returned with feedback.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 05:29:28 Re: logical replication empty transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 05:25:19 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2