Re: Making index_set_state_flags() transactional

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Making index_set_state_flags() transactional
Date: 2020-09-14 04:58:56
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 06:42:09PM +0300, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> I agree that transactional update in index_set_state_flags() is good for
> both cases, that you mentioned and don't see any restrictions. It seems that
> not doing this before was just a loose end, as the comment from 813fb03
> patch clearly stated, that it is safe to make this update transactional.
> The patch itself looks clear and committable.

Thanks for double-checking, Anastasia. Committed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-09-14 05:17:34 Re: typo in snapmgr.c and procarray.c
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-09-14 04:48:55 Re: Print logical WAL message content