Re: Online checksums verification in the backend

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date: 2020-09-10 07:47:23
Message-ID: 20200910074723.GA91494@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:25:29AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > I'll do some becnhmarking and see if I can get some figures, but it'll probably
> > take some time. In the meantime I'm attaching v11 of the patch that should
> > address all other comments.
> I just realized that I forgot to update one of the Makefile when moving the TAP
> test folder. v12 attached should fix that.

And the cfbot just reported a new error for Windows build. Attached v13 should
fix that.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v13-0001-Add-a-pg_check_relation-function.patch text/plain 44.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-10 07:59:50 Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-09-10 07:43:18 Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.