Re: Internal key management system

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Ahsan Hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Internal key management system
Date: 2020-09-08 08:23:23
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:06:38PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Since the previous patch sets conflicts with the current HEAD, I've
> attached the rebased patch set.

Patch 0002 fails to apply, so a rebase is needed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-09-08 08:55:57 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-09-08 08:23:04 Re: Boundary value check in lazy_tid_reaped()