| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rahila <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More tests with USING INDEX replident and dropped indexes |
| Date: | 2020-08-30 07:05:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20200830070548.GA2183@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:28:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch for 1) and 2) grouped together, to ease review for
> now. I think that we had better fix 1) separately though, so I am
> going to start a new thread about that with a separate patch as the
> current thread is misleading.
A fix for consistency problem with indisreplident and invalid indexes
has been committed as of 9511fb37. Attached is a rebased patch, where
I noticed two incorrect things:
- The comment of REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX is originally incorrect. If
the index is dropped, the replica index switches back to nothing.
- relreplident was getting reset one transaction too late, when the
old index is marked as dead.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Reset-pg_class.relreplident-when-associated-repli.patch | text/x-diff | 10.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2020-08-30 07:25:39 | Re: Improvements in Copy From |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2020-08-30 05:34:33 | Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding |