Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Date: 2020-07-26 18:54:27
Message-ID: 20200726185427.GI4286@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 04:42:06PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:52:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Sounds fine to me. Thanks.
> >
> > Do others have any objections with this wording?
>
> I have used the wording suggested by Alvaro, and applied the patch
> down to 13. Now let's see about the original item of this thread..

Updated with updated wording to avoid "null", per Tom.

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Include-the-leader-PID-in-logfile.patch text/x-diff 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-07-26 19:10:06 Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-07-26 18:34:06 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk