|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>|
|Subject:||Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:39:57AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 20:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:46:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:07:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > A customer's upgrade failed, and it took me a while to
> > > > figure out that the problem was that they had set
> > > > "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age=10000" on the new cluster.
> > > >
> > > > The consequence was that the "vacuumdb --freeze" that
> > > > takes place before copying commit log files failed to
> > > > freeze "pg_database".
> > > > That caused later updates to the table to fail with
> > > > "Could not open file "pg_xact/0000": No such file or directory."
> > > >
> > > > I think it would increase the robustness of pg_upgrade to
> > > > force "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" to 0 on the new cluster.
> > Thank you, applied to all supported PG versions.
> Thanks for picking this up and taking care of it.
Sure. I never noticed how this setting, when it was added in 2009,
could affect pg_uprade, but is certainly can:
Author: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Date: Sat Dec 19 01:32:45 2009 +0000
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
|Next Message||Dean Rasheed||2020-06-16 09:34:38||Re: factorial of negative numbers|
|Previous Message||Juan José Santamaría Flecha||2020-06-16 09:08:56||Re: factorial of negative numbers|