Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations
Date: 2020-05-24 02:31:55
Message-ID: 20200524023155.GA15019@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-May-23, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:32:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Thanks for the input, Robert. So, even if we are post-beta1 it looks
> > like there are more upsides than downsides to get that stuff done
> > sooner than later. I propose to get that applied in the next couple
> > of days, please let me know if there are any objections.
>
> Hearing nothing, done. Thanks all for the discussion.

Thanks!

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2020-05-24 07:31:47 Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-05-23 22:47:51 Re: Warn when parallel restoring a custom dump without data offsets