| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly |
| Date: | 2020-04-26 17:56:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20200426175614.GT28974@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 08:33:52PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > That's the last known issue with the patch. I doubt anyone will elect to pick
> > it up in the next 8 hours, but I think it's in very good shape for v14 :)
>
> I tweaked some comments and docs and plan to mark this RfC.
Rebased onto d12bdba77b0fce9df818bc84ad8b1d8e7a96614b
Restored two tests from Alexey's original patch which exposed issue with
REINDEX DATABASE when allow_system_table_mods=off.
--
Justin
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v21-0001-tab-completion-for-reindex-verbose.patch | text/x-diff | 1.8 KB |
| v21-0002-Change-REINDEX-CLUSTER-to-accept-an-option-list.patch | text/x-diff | 23.7 KB |
| v21-0003-Allow-REINDEX-to-change-tablespace.patch | text/x-diff | 27.8 KB |
| v21-0004-Allow-CLUSTER-and-VACUUM-FULL-to-change-tablespa.patch | text/x-diff | 23.5 KB |
| v21-0005-Implement-vacuum-full-cluster-INDEX_TABLESPACE-t.patch | text/x-diff | 19.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Coleman | 2020-04-26 18:46:19 | Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-26 17:40:54 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |