Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2020-04-04 22:32:12
Message-ID: 20200404223212.GC3442685@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:24:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?

Once the buildfarm is clean for a day, sure. The buildfarm has already
revealed a missing perl2host call.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2020-04-04 22:34:38 Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-04 22:24:34 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?