Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes
Date: 2020-04-02 02:29:04
Message-ID: 20200402022904.xssjyfupdaj2ejyp@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 10:55:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:01:48PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Yeah, the opclass params patches got broken by 773df883e adding enum
>> reloptions. The breakage is somewhat extensive so I'll leave it up to
>> Nikita to fix it in [1]. Until that happens, apply the patches on
>> top of caba97a9d9 for review.
>This has been close to two months now, so I have the patch as RwF.
>Feel free to update if you think that's incorrect.

I see the opclass parameters patch got committed a couple days ago, so
I've rebased the patch series on top of it. The pach was marked RwF
since 2019-11, so I'll add it to the next CF.


Tomas Vondra
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Pass-all-keys-to-BRIN-consistent-function-a-20200402.patch text/plain 20.8 KB
0002-Move-IS-NOT-NULL-checks-to-bringetbitmap-20200402.patch text/plain 9.9 KB
0003-Move-processing-of-NULLs-from-BRIN-support--20200402.patch text/plain 16.1 KB
0004-BRIN-bloom-indexes-20200402.patch text/plain 126.1 KB
0005-BRIN-multi-range-minmax-indexes-20200402.patch text/plain 196.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-04-02 02:32:50 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Previous Message James Coleman 2020-04-02 02:09:20 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)