Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL
Date: 2020-03-25 12:46:56
Message-ID: 20200325124656.GW21443@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:12:05AM +0900, Artur Zakirov wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> On 3/25/2020 2:08 AM, David Steele wrote:
> > On 12/17/19 3:10 AM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> > >
> > > I attached new version of the patch. It still uses
> > > pg_identify_object(), I'm not sure about other ways to build
> > > identities yet.
> >
> > This patch applies and builds but fails regression tests on Linux and
> > Windows:
> > https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/666134656
> > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.85292
>
> Regression tests fail because cfbot applies
> "test_rename_catalog_objects.patch". Regression tests pass without it.
>
> This patch shouldn't be applied by cfbot. I'm not sure how to do this. But
> maybe it is possible to use different extension name for the test patch, not
> ".patch".

Yes, see Tom's message here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14255.1536781029%40sss.pgh.pa.us

I don't know what extensions cfbot looks for; in that case I didn't have a file
extension at all.

--
Justin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-25 12:51:25 Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-25 12:41:55 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number