Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2020-03-18 18:29:46
Message-ID: 20200318182946.GA27596@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

There were conflicts again, so I rebased once more. Didn't do anything

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Allow-logical-decoding-on-standby.patch text/x-diff 9.3 KB
v6-0002-Add-info-in-WAL-records-in-preparation-for-logica.patch text/x-diff 18.2 KB
v6-0003-Handle-logical-slot-conflicts-on-standby.patch text/x-diff 23.9 KB
v6-0004-New-TAP-test-for-logical-decoding-on-standby.patch text/x-diff 20.6 KB
v6-0005-Doc-changes-describing-details-about-logical-deco.patch text/x-diff 1.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-18 18:42:49 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2020-03-18 17:58:03 Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROM and DELETE USING