On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 08:09:24AM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:39:49AM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:19 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:06:25AM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 6:30 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > > >> Hmm. There could be an argument here for skipping invalid toast
> > > >> indexes within reindex_index(), because we are sure about having at
> > > >> least one valid toast index at anytime, and these are not concerned
> > > >> with CIC.
> PFA a patch to fix the problem using this approach.
> I also added isolation tester regression tests. The failure is simulated using
> a pg_cancel_backend() on top of pg_stat_activity, using filters on a
> specifically set application name and the query text to avoid any unwanted
> interaction. I also added a 1s locking delay, to ensure that even slow/CCA
> machines can consistently reproduce the failure. Maybe that's not enough, or
> maybe testing this scenario is not worth the extra time.
Sorry, I just realized that I forgot to commit the last changes before sending
the patch, so here's the correct v2.