Re: Do not check unlogged indexes on standby

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do not check unlogged indexes on standby
Date: 2020-02-06 15:59:09
Message-ID: 20200206155909.GA9007@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread.
> Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected
> the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the
> face of concurrent splits and deletions [1].
> I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been
> resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?

Nah. I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't
sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this
one. I wasn't looking at any CF entries.

Thanks for the explanation,

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-02-06 16:03:51 Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-02-06 14:44:26 Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index