|From:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>|
|Cc:||Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Do not check unlogged indexes on standby|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread.
> Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected
> the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the
> face of concurrent splits and deletions .
> I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been
> resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?
Nah. I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't
sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this
one. I wasn't looking at any CF entries.
Thanks for the explanation,
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2020-02-06 16:03:51||Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11|
|Previous Message||Justin Pryzby||2020-02-06 14:44:26||Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index|