Re: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to expose inconsistencies.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to expose inconsistencies.
Date: 2020-02-03 06:55:47
Message-ID: 20200203065547.GC2180@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 02:46:16PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Actually, thinking more about it, I'd rather remove this part as well,
> keeping only the change in the third paragraph of this comment block.

I have tweaked a bit the comments in this area, and applied the
patch. I'll begin a new thread with the rest of the refactoring.
There are a couple of things I'd like to double-check first.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-02-03 07:08:07 Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-02-03 06:45:21 Re: ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record