| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Ought to use heap_multi_insert() for pg_attribute/depend insertions? |
| Date: | 2020-01-26 20:30:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20200126203059.utxcn36vdqzajmvm@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-01-22 23:18:12 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 26 Nov 2019, at 06:44, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Re this patch being in WoA state for some time [0]:
>
> > The regression tests of contrib/test_decoding are still failing here:
> > +ERROR: could not resolve cmin/cmax of catalog tuple
>
> This is the main thing left with this patch, and I've been unable so far to
> figure it out. I have an unscientific hunch that this patch is shaking out
> something (previously unexercised) in the logical decoding code supporting
> multi-inserts in the catalog. If anyone has ideas or insights, I would love
> the help.
Perhaps we can take a look at it together while at fosdem? Feel free to
remind me...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-01-26 21:03:03 | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-01-26 20:29:38 | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |