Re: Patch to document base64 encoding

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Patch to document base64 encoding
Date: 2020-01-22 01:03:38
Message-ID: 20200121190338.275adaa0@slate.karlpinc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 18:05:49 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> And there were some errors; notably, the patch added descriptions
> for shaNNN(text), which are functions we do not have AFAICS.

Apologies for that, my mistake.

Thank you to Fabien and everybody who helped.

Regards,

Karl <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-01-22 01:17:52 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message David Fetter 2020-01-22 00:41:04 Re: Increase psql's password buffer size