| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
| Date: | 2020-01-07 18:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20200107180524.mqz456t2pmr7crpw@development |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
This patch is currently in "needs review" state, but that seems quite
wrong - there's been a lot of discussions about how we might improve
behavior for append-only-tables, but IMO there's no clear consensus nor
a patch that we might review.
So I think this should be either "waiting on author" or maybe "rejected
with feedback". Is there any chance of getting a reviewable patch in the
current commitfest? If not, I propose to mark it as RWF.
I still hope we can improve this somehow in time for PG13. The policy is
not to allow new non-trivial patches in the last CF, but hopefully this
might be considered an old patch.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-01-07 18:05:33 | Re: backup manifests |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-01-07 17:56:19 | Re: RFC: seccomp-bpf support |