Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Date: 2020-01-03 06:49:17
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 11:45:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ah. The CF app doesn't understand that (and hence the cfbot ditto),
> so you might want to repost just the currently-proposed patch to get
> the cfbot to try it.

Yes, let's do that. Here you go with a v2. While on it, I have
noticed in the docs a mention to OpenSSL 1.0.0 regarding our
sslcompression parameter in libpq, so a paragraph can be removed.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Remove-code-older-than-OpenSSL-0.9.8-and-1.0.0.patch text/x-diff 3.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-01-03 06:51:32 Re: Commit fest manager for 2020-01
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2020-01-03 05:02:17 Re: Assigning ROW variable having NULL value to RECORD type variable doesn't give any structure to the RECORD variable.