Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Date: 2019-12-23 05:34:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all,

I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we
had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as
things are more consistent with table AM. It is a bit annoying to
name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too
generic name. That would require switching a couple of header files
for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move
makes sense thinking long-term?

Any thoughts?


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2019-12-23 06:50:58 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Previous Message Rushabh Lathia 2019-12-23 04:32:28 Re: backup manifests