Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update
Date: 2019-12-21 02:44:25
Message-ID: 20191221024425.GE15758@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:30:38PM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote:
> I wanted to register the patch for the next CF so it's not forgotten, but see
> it's already there. Why have you set the status to "withdrawn"?

Because my patch was incorrect, and I did not make enough bandwidth to
think more on the matter. I am actually not sure that what you are
proposing is better.. If you wish to get that reviewed, could you add
a new CF entry?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-21 02:47:57 Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-21 02:39:22 Re: Disallow cancellation of waiting for synchronous replication