Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction
Date: 2019-12-01 02:59:13
Message-ID: 20191201025913.GA2355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:11:53AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> I'm sorry to repeat what I mentioned in my previous mail, but my v2
> patch's approach is based on the database textbook and seems
> intuitive. So I attached the rebased version.

If you wish to do so, that's fine by me but I have not dived into the
details of the thread much. Please not anyway that the patch does not
apply anymore and that it needs a rebase. So for now I have moved the
patch to next CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:03:14 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 02:57:28 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line