Re: [PATCH] use separate PartitionedRelOptions structure to store partitioned table options

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use separate PartitionedRelOptions structure to store partitioned table options
Date: 2019-11-14 03:38:43
Message-ID: 20191114033843.GB1910@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:02:24PM +0300, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> I did not read that thread yet, when I sent v3 patch.
> build_reloptions is a good stuff and we should use it for sure.
>
> I've looked at yours v4 version of the patch, it is exactly what we need here.
> Can we commit it as it is?

I have done an extra lookup, removing PartitionedRelOptions because we
have no need for it yet, and committed the split.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2019-11-14 04:07:30 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-14 03:01:29 Re: MarkBufferDirtyHint() and LSN update