Re: Efficient output for integer types

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Efficient output for integer types
Date: 2019-09-24 05:26:21
Message-ID: 20190924052620.GP31596@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 06:30:18AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:35:07PM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>
> Per discussion on IRC, change some functions to take only unsigned
> integer types so as not to branch for the case of negative numbers
> they're never actually called with.
>
> Best,
> David.

...and part of a pgindent run

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Attachment Content-Type Size
v14-0001-Make-int4-and-int8-operations-more-efficent.patch text/x-diff 22.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-09-24 05:48:16 Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated in standby but failed to truncate in master node
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2019-09-24 05:25:03 recovery starting when backup_label exists, but not recovery.signal