Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows

From: Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows
Date: 2019-09-06 15:03:38
Message-ID: 20190906150338.GA10470@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Sep-06, Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant wrote:

> I think you should get 0001 (+0002?) pushed and see what the buildfarm
> thinks; move forward from there.

... but of course this goes counter to what you said earlier about 0001
needing to be pushed last.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2019-09-06 15:06:34 Re: Fetching timeline during recovery
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant 2019-09-06 15:02:24 Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows