|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|To:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Ramanarayana' <raam(dot)soft(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prajwal A V <prajwal450(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Contribution to Perldoc for TestLib module in Postgres|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 01:48:14PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Agreed ... that's pretty much the same thing I tried to say upthread. I
> wrote my own synopsis, partly using your suggestions. I reworded the
> description for the routines (I don't think there's any I didn't touch),
> added a mention of $windows_os, added a =head1 to split out the ad-hoc
> routines from the Test::More wrappers.
> And pushed.
> Please give it another look. It might need more polish.
Thanks for committing. I have read through the commit and I am not
noticing any issue sorting out. One thing may be to give a short
description for some of the routine's arguments like
check_mode_recursive, but I think that we could live without that
|Next Message||Michael Paquier||2019-09-03 06:37:27||Re: Proposal: roll pg_stat_statements into core|
|Previous Message||Kyotaro Horiguchi||2019-09-03 06:13:01||Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea?|