Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()
Date: 2019-09-02 16:00:25
Message-ID: 20190902160025.GA5163@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jul-13, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:

> Considering the later arguments on-list, I plan on submitting a more
> elaborate patchset integrating the feedback received so far, and along the
> following lines:
>
> - uuid type, v4 generation and uuid_version() in core
>
> - Provide a means to rename/supercede extensions keeping backwards
> compatibility (i.e. uuid-ossp -> uuid, keep old code working)

It is wholly unclear what this commitfest entry is all about; in the
thread there's a mixture about a new uuid_version(), some new v4 stuff
migrating from pgcrypto (which apparently was done), plus some kind of
mechanism to allow upgrading extension names; all this stemming from
feedback from the patch submitted in April. But there hasn't been a new
patch in a long time, and there won't be a new patch version during the
current commitfest. Therefore, I'm closing this entry as Returned with
Feedback. The author(s) can create a new entry in a future commitfest
once they have a new patch.

I do suggest to keep such a patch restricted in scope.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-02 16:07:17 Re: Proposal: roll pg_stat_statements into core
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-02 15:41:58 Re: safe to overload objectSubId for a type?