Re: Problem with default partition pruning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: shawn wang <shawn(dot)wang(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Date: 2019-08-04 22:43:49
Message-ID: 20190804224349.GA1366@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I propose the comment rewordings as attached. Mostly, this updates the
comment atop the function to cover the case being modified, and then the
new comment just refers to the new explicitly stated policy, so it
bcomes simpler.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch text/x-diff 5.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-08-05 01:15:19 Re: Store FullTransactionId in TwoPhaseFileHeader/GlobalTransactionData
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2019-08-04 22:19:28 Re: pglz performance