Re: Patch to document base64 encoding

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Patch to document base64 encoding
Date: 2019-08-02 15:09:36
Message-ID: 20190802100936.6ea9ead7@slate.karlpinc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:44:43 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I don't really have a problem with
> repeating the entries for other functions that exist in both
> text and bytea variants, either.

Ok. Thanks. I'll repeat entries then.

Regards,

Karl <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2019-08-02 15:11:19 Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2019-08-02 15:00:42 Re: Patch to document base64 encoding