|From:||David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>|
|To:||Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:23:57PM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:46 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:22 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > >> Rebase after pg_indent. Besides, off the list there was a suggestion that this
> > > > > >> could be useful to accept more than one data type as a key for subscripting.
> > > > > >> E.g. for jsonb it probably makes sense to understand both a simple key name and
> > > > > >> jsonpath:
> > > >
> > > > And one more rebase.
> > >
> > > Oh, looks like I was just confused and it wasn't necessary - for some reason
> > > starting from v22 cfbot tries to apply v6 instead of the latest one.
> > Hi Dmitry,
> > Sorry about that. It looks like I broke the cfbot code that picks
> > which thread to pull patches from when there are several registered in
> > the CF app, the last time the HTML format changed. Now it's back to
> > picking whichever thread has the most recent message on it. Such are
> > the joys of web scraping (obviously we need better integration and
> > that will happen, I just haven't had time yet).
> > Anyway, I fixed that. But now you really do need to rebase :-)
> Thanks for fixing and for the reminder! Here is the new rebased version. It
> contradicts a bit with 44982e7d09, because I'm actually using indexprSlice, but
> I guess we can figure this out.
> And I must admit, it's a pure fun to maintain such a large patch set in sync
> for already several years :)
The tutorial piece has bit-rotted slightly. Please find attached a
patch atop yours that fixes it.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
|Next Message||Thomas Munro||2019-07-11 08:19:31||Re: Ltree syntax improvement|
|Previous Message||Floris Van Nee||2019-07-11 07:41:31||Re: Index Skip Scan|