Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables
Date: 2019-05-29 15:20:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:33:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> But couple of other points mentioned in Caveats (of 5.11. Table
> Partitioning) are already repeated in 5.10.1. Caveats; for example, note
> the point about VACUUM, ANALYZE, INSERT ON CONFLICT, etc. applying to
> single tables. So, perhaps it won't hurt to repeat the caveat about
> indexes and foreign keys too.

OK, committed as such. Your patch linked to the top of the
inheritance section, so I redirected that to the actual section about
caveats for clarity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2019-05-29 15:30:33 Re: Quick doc typo fix
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-05-29 15:11:53 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins