| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2019-05-29 15:20:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20190529152025.GD2848@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:33:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> But couple of other points mentioned in 5.11.3.3. Caveats (of 5.11. Table
> Partitioning) are already repeated in 5.10.1. Caveats; for example, note
> the point about VACUUM, ANALYZE, INSERT ON CONFLICT, etc. applying to
> single tables. So, perhaps it won't hurt to repeat the caveat about
> indexes and foreign keys too.
OK, committed as such. Your patch linked to the top of the
inheritance section, so I redirected that to the actual section about
caveats for clarity.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2019-05-29 15:30:33 | Re: Quick doc typo fix |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-05-29 15:11:53 | Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins |