Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date: 2019-04-29 14:23:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:48:17AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Hello David,
> > My mistake. Fixed.
> About v6: applies, compiles, make check ok.
> Code is ok.
> Maybe there could be a comment to tell that prior version are not addressed,
> something like:
> ...
> }
> /* else do not bother guessing the temporary status on old version */

Did something like this.

> No tests, pending an added TAP test infrastructure for psql.


> I have a question a out the index stuff: indexes seem to appear as entries
> in pg_class, and ISTM that they can be temporary/unlogged/permanent as
> attached to corresponding objects. So the guard is not very useful and it
> could make sense to show the information on indexes as well.


David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Show-detailed-relation-persistence-in-dt.patch text/x-diff 2.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-29 14:54:35 Re: Typofixes in src/bin
Previous Message David Fetter 2019-04-29 14:17:10 Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql