Re: Re: A separate table level option to control compression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Re: A separate table level option to control compression
Date: 2019-04-08 06:43:36
Message-ID: 20190408064336.GI2712@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 09:18:18PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Yeah, I'd hoped for some more opinions. I agree we've run out of time :-(

We are a couple of hours away from the freeze, so I have marked the
patch as returned with feedback. Let's see if we can still do
something for the other item in v11 or even only v12, still this is
not likely an issue which would prevent v12 to be released.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-04-08 06:57:59 Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation
Previous Message Noah Misch 2019-04-08 06:41:41 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid