| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | r(dot)zharkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed | 
| Date: | 2019-04-02 16:00:48 | 
| Message-ID: | 20190402160048.2rohtgdmwsbkhhw6@alap3.anarazel.de | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
Hi,
On 2019-04-02 11:51:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2019-04-02 11:44:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What that seems to indicate is that the "unexpected table_lock_tuple
> >> status" error was thrown during commit, which seems pretty odd.
> 
> > I suspect that's a deferred trigger. But that code obviously could throw
> > errors, so we gotta handle that correctly.
> 
> Deferred triggers execute before the real transaction commit, not during
> the critical section surrounding where we set the bit in pg_clog.
> But this error is seemingly getting thrown from within that critical
> section, otherwise we wouldn't have inconsistent xact status afterwards.
I don't think it was thrown during the critical section - we'd otherwise
see the ERROR about unexpected lock status converted to a PANIC (and the
"cannot abort transaction, already committed" is a PANIC itself).  I
suspect it's more likely that we corrupt the xact.c status somewhere -
but it's hard to say without knowing more about the workload.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-02 16:13:20 | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed | 
| Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-04-02 15:53:33 | BUG #15729: Error 'invalid memory alloc request size' during updating a big xml field |