Re: Incorrect visibility test function assigned to snapshot

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incorrect visibility test function assigned to snapshot
Date: 2019-02-18 13:45:38
Message-ID: 20190218134538.GA809@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-18, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:01:29PM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote:
> > As for the bug fix, I think the additional assignment does not make things
> > worse because SnapBuildInitialSnapshot() already does overwrite some fields:
> > "xip" and "xnt".
>
> Ah, right. I somewhat missed that. Let's move on with merging your
> patch then. Are there any objections about that?

None here.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-18 13:49:56 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2019-02-18 13:33:53 Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT