Re: Log a sample of transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
Cc: "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Log a sample of transactions
Date: 2019-02-05 03:49:07
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Adrien NAYRAT wrote:
> Could it be acceptable if I set log_min_duration_statement = 0?

At least this has the merit to make the behavior not rely on
randomness. I have not looked at the patch in details so I cannot say
for sure, but I am not sure if it is worth the extra cycles to have
tests integrated so they may be removed from the final commit if they
are too expensive for little value. It is always helpful to have
deterministic tests to give a shot at the feature and ease review of

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-05 03:59:12 Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-05 03:35:14 Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload