Re: cost_sort() improvements

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cost_sort() improvements
Date: 2019-01-31 11:23:38
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-11-29 17:53:31 +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 3:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:22:10PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > Could you perhaps summarize the reasoning or at least point me to the
> > > relevant parts of the sources, so that I know which parts to focus on?
> >
> > Teodor, this patch is waiting for some input from you. I have moved it
> > to next CF for now, 2018-11.
> The patch also needs to be adjusted - it fails on "make check" on join,
> aggregates and partition_aggregate.

As nothing has happened since, I'm marking this as returned with


Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-31 11:24:07 Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-01-31 11:22:56 Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements