|From:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|To:||Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2018-11-29 13:45:15 +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:53 PM Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Given I've no feedback on this idea yet, I'll try to implement a PoC
> > patch for that. It doesn't look to be difficult. And we'll see how
> > does it work.
> Unfortunately, current version of the patch doesn't pass the tests and fails on
> initdb. But maybe you already have this PoC you were talking about, that will
> also incorporate the feedback from this thread? For now I'll move it to the
> next CF.
Given that nothing has happened since, I'm going to close this CF entry
with returned as feedback.
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2019-01-31 11:20:45||Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Retail IndexTuple deletion|
|Previous Message||Oleksii Kliukin||2019-01-31 11:08:18||Re: Connection slots reserved for replication|