Re: Add pg_partition_root to get top-most parent of a partition tree

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Add pg_partition_root to get top-most parent of a partition tree
Date: 2018-12-12 01:48:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:46:05AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:48:59PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I think adding a pg_partition_root() call to as many pg_partition_tree
>> tests as you modified is overkill ... OTOH I'd have one test that
>> invokes pg_partition_tree(pg_partition_root(some-partition)) to verify
>> that starting from any point in the tree you get the whole tree.
> Good idea, thanks for the input.

The recent commit cc53123 has fixed a couple of issues with
pg_partition_tree, so attached is a rebased patch which similarly makes
pg_partition_root return NULL for unsupported relkinds and undefined
relations. I have also simplified the tests based on Alvaro's
suggestion to use pg_partition_tree(pg_partition_root(partfoo)).


Attachment Content-Type Size
partition-root-v2.patch text/x-diff 9.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-12-12 01:49:59 Re: Sketch of a fix for that truncation data corruption issue
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-12 00:52:25 Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation